|
Blantika: Multidisciplinary Jornal Volume 2 Number 9,
July, 2024 p-
ISSN 2987-758X e-ISSN 2985-4199 |
|
ANALYSIS OF PUBLIC RESPONSE TO THE USE OF
CHEMICAL CASTRATION FOR SEXUAL OFFENDERS IN INDONESIA Anggi
Khairina Hanum Hasibuan, Aris Priyo Agus Santoso, Aryono 1Universitas
Pertahanan, IPSC Sentul, 2,3Universitas Duta Bangsa Surakarta, Indonesia
E-mail: anggi.khairina@gmail.com |
||
ABSTRACT Sexual violence includes various
immoral behaviors such as sexual insults, touching unauthorized body parts,
viewing and sending unwanted sexual and pornographic images, forced
participation in sexual and pornographic activities, rape, sexual torture, female
genital mutilation, sexual exploitation, sexual slavery, forced prostitution,
forced pregnancy, forced sterilization, forced abortion, and intentional
infection with sexually transmitted diseases such as AIDS. Sexual crimes also
occur in a state of war, mainly as a tool to oppress a country. In Indonesia,
Law no. 17 of 2020 lists chemical castration as one of the solutions in
preventing repeat sexual crimes for children. Chemical castration is one of
the sanctions that is condemned by the world community but has a major impact
in reducing the rate of sexual crime cases. This study aims to analyze the
results of the response received by the community to the existence of
chemical castration punishment in sexual offenders. The research method in
this study uses the type of empirical research and the nature of qualitative
research, with data collection methods in the form of questionnaires and
secondary data from interviews from youtube and other written documents. The
results of this study. Of the 100 respondents who agreed to the existence of
chemical castration by answering yes and strongly agreeing, reaching 60%.
Doubts about the success of the implementation of chemical castration can
have a deterrent effect on sexual offenders. However, most people agree that
the existence of chemical castration needs to be carried out not only
pedophilia but also perpetrators of sexual crimes against women). Keywords: Chemical
Castration, Crime, Sexual. |
||
|
This work is
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International |
|
INTRODUCTION
Sexual violence There are many forms, common to all of them is that sexual behavior and
touch occur with or without the consent of others. So this crime is the sexual
self-determination of the person (Irfawandi et al., 2023). This violence includes: sexual humiliation; touching of any part of the
body that is not allowed; the viewing and transmission of unwanted sexual and
pornographic images; forced participation in sexual and pornographic
activities; rape, sexual torture, female
genital mutilation , sexual exploitation, sexual slavery, forced
prostitution, forced pregnancy, forced sterilization, forced abortion, to
intentional sexually transmitted disease infections such as AIDS.
War
conditions often give rise to conflicts not only between militants but also
have an impact on civilians, especially women. Sexual violence against women
and girls during wars has always been a part of human history. Sexual violence
occurs in peacetime, is exacerbated in times of armed conflict, and extends to
post-war societies. The use of rape as a strategic means of waging war is, in
the end, a 'logical' consequence of unequal power relations. The perpetrators,
who are mostly men, consist not only of soldiers, paramilitary, and police, but
also civilians. Many resolutions and agreements were established by the
international community (UN) to protect women from violence and strengthen
their rights. However, political will is still lacking to truly fulfill the
promise. Unless we succeed in eradicating the misogynistic structures that
underlie sexual violence and creating gender justice for women and children (Turangan, 2015).
The
implementation of chemical castration as one of the sanctions does not receive
the support of the world community. Despite having a major impact in reducing
the rate of sexual crimes, chemical castration is considered against human
rights. Even so, based on data from Alam's research, 2020, chemical castration
is currently widely carried out in various countries such as Denmark (1929),
Sweden (1944), Finland (1970), Norway (1977), Poland (2009), the United States,
namely the state of California (1996) and several other states, Argentina
(2010), Australia, Israel, New Zealand, South Korea (2011), and Russia (2011),
Moldova (2012), and Estonia (2012) including Indonesia. In Indonesia, the
application for chemical castration is listed in Law 17/2020 concerning the
Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2016
concerning the Second Amendment to Law No. 23/2002 concerning Child Protection
which was passed into law on November 9, 2016 (Heriamsal & Manurung, 2024).
The Mojokerto District Court Decision
No.69/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Mjk is the first decision that ordered the imposition of
chemical castration for Convict M. Aris, after completing his prison sentence.
The implementation of the chemical castration law is by injecting it into the
human body so that its lust decreases or even disappears (Siagian et al., 2023). The existence of chemical castration is considered torture for convicts
and violates human rights. However, the purpose of criminal law in the modern
era is no longer oriented towards retaliation, but to make the perpetrator and
the victim can both get justice. Most people who know about the existence of
this act respond to consent and are considered a matter of justice (Wahyuni et al., 2024).
Based on
this background, it was found that the possibility of using chemical castration
as a sanction to replace the death penalty in crimes against humanity including
war, especially related to sexual crimes (Sabir, 2022). This gave rise to the idea for researchers to study these problems by
connecting them to the community's response regarding the application of
chemical castration. From this idea, the researcher took a discussion entitled
"Analysis of Community Response to the Use of Chemical Castration for
Sexual Crimes Perpetrators in Indonesia" (Sari, 2021).
The
purpose of this study is to analyze the handling of sexual crimes based on
Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, describe the implementation of Chemical
Castration in Indonesia, analyze the results of the response received by the
community to the existence of chemical castration punishment for sexual
offenders (Mardiya, 2017).
Through
this research, benefits can be obtained, namely this research is expected to be
a source of deepening insight and expanding knowledge in the field of law,
especially the regulation of the use of chemical castration as a punishment for
perpetrators of sexual crimes in Indonesia. The results of this study are
expected to provide benefits, knowledge, insights and information to the public
regarding the use of chemical castration as one of the alternative sanctions
for sexual crimes (Ginting & Susanti, 2023). The results of this study are expected to be reading materials and
information to increase knowledge about the community's response regarding the
use of chemical castration as an alternative sanction for sexual crimes (Hutapea, 2020).
METHODS AND
RESEARCH
This type
of research is quantitative descriptive using, namely the collection of
respondent data through questionnaires. The approach used in this study is an
approach by seeing, studying, and understanding reality and practice in the
field through the results of the questionnaire collected. The research in this
writing includes sociological or non-doctrinal legal research and is supported
by secondary data (Daming, 2020). According to Soerjono Soekanto, empirical sociological legal research
includes research on legal identification (unwritten) and research on legal
effectiveness. The work of law in society can be studied from the level of
legal effectiveness. Meanwhile, judging from its nature, this research is a
quantitative descriptive research (Arake, 2020). Descriptive research aims to descriptive the data collected in order to
solve research problems. This study aims to describe numerical data from
questionnaires based on statistical results obtained from respondents with
journal data and other documents that have been collected (Hasanah & Soponyono, 2018).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The
document data obtained was linked to the results of the analysis of the
community response obtained from the questionnaire. The questionnaire was
distributed to the public online in the hope of getting 100 respondents. The
sample questionnaire that has been filled out is in Appendix 1. The gender
ratio between men and women is 50:50 (Figure 1).
Figure
1 Diagram of the division of men and women
Most of
them are non-legal academics, there are two law students who work as academics.
Other non-legal people work as civil servants and self-employed.
Figure
2. Overall Professional Diagram and Number of Legal Societies
From
online data, two out of 100 respondents who had filled in data through the g-form explained that they had
experienced sexual harassment, namely women. The types of sexual crimes that
have been experienced are related to direct or indirect sexual crimes (taking
photos without permission to certain parts)
Figure
3 Number of Responses to Sexual Crimes Experiences
The
questionnaire data collection was continued with a section on community
response to justice and law. The basis of assessment in making this
questionnaire statement uses a likert scale so that the statement is made in 5
measures, namely Strongly disagree (STS), disagree (SS), hesitate (RR), agree
(S) and strongly agree (SS). Scale creation is divided into two properties of
statements, namely Favourable and Unfavourable. The statement is favourable or
positive where the ranking points from STS are valued at 1 to SS are valued at
5. On the other hand, statements are unfavourable or have a positive value,
where the ranking points from STS are valued at 5 to SS are valued at 1.
The
questionnaire data collection was continued with a section on community
response to chemical castration (Table 3). The data obtained generally has
valid and reliable criteria. The data generated can then be further analyzed
regarding public knowledge about justice and law (can be seen in Appendix 5).
All data is normally distributed from the analysis, all data can be interpreted
descriptively to each statement. Statements are varied between favourable and
unfavourable statements. Most of the statements were answered hesitantly
(1,2,5,6,9,12-14). Statements 8 and 10 are unfavourable and vote disagree. The
unfavourable statement agrees to statement 4 and the favourable agrees to
statements 3,7, 11 and 15.
Table 1. Data on
Community Response to Chemical Castration
STATEMENT |
Item |
% Answer |
||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
||
1. In my opinion, the act of
chemical castration in PP no 70/2020 is very useful as a preventive measure
for sexual crimes |
Favourable Agree |
9,3 |
9,3 |
28,1 |
21,87 |
31,25 |
2. I believe chemical castration
violates the principles of Human Rights (Human Rights) |
Unfavourable Agree |
9,3 |
6,25 |
31,2 |
27,5 |
15,62 |
3. In my opinion, chemical
castration provides justice for victims of sexual crimes |
Favourable Agree |
6,2 |
9,37 |
23.4 |
40,62 |
20,36 |
4. The implementation of chemical
castration is not in accordance with the customs and culture in Indonesia |
Unfavourable Agree |
12,5 |
3,12 |
37,5 |
25 |
21,87 |
5. I think the implementation of
castration using hormone-reducing chemicals is inhumane |
Unfavourable Agree |
18,7 |
3,12 |
34,3 |
25 |
18,75 |
6. In my opinion chemical
castration violates religious law |
Unfavourable Agree |
15,6 |
9,37 |
34,3 |
28,12 |
12,5 |
7. The implementation of chemical
castration provides a deterrent effect for perpetrators of sexual crimes |
Favourable Agree |
3,12 |
9,37 |
28,1 |
21,87 |
37,5 |
8. The administration of chemical
castration should only be applied to sexual crimes against children |
Unfavourable disagree |
9,37 |
28,1 |
37,5 |
18,75 |
6,25 |
9. Giving chemical castration to
humans violates ethics in science and medicine |
Unfavourable Agree |
3,12 |
15,6 |
37,5 |
28,12 |
15,62 |
10. Chemical castration does not
need to be carried out because sexual crimes are a mental disorder |
Unfavourable disagree |
34,3 |
21,8 |
28,1 |
6,25 |
9,375 |
11. Chemical castration should be
applied to all sexual crimes |
Favourable Agree |
28,1 |
18,7 |
12.5 |
34,37 |
6,25 |
12. Chemical castration cannot be
granted for war crimes because it involves international parties. |
Unfavourable Agree |
3,12 |
15,6 |
37,5 |
31,25 |
12,5 |
13. Chemical castration violates
international law |
Unfavourable Agree |
6,25 |
6,2 |
43,7 |
34,37 |
9,375 |
14. In my opinion, chemical
castration is a rehabilitation measure given to perpetrators of sexual crimes |
Favourable Agree |
3,12 |
9,3 |
43,7 |
31,25 |
12,5 |
15. In my opinion, the provision
of chemical castration for perpetrators of sexual crimes must obtain approval
from various parties (police, medical personnel, psychiatrists, etc.) |
Favourable Agree |
0 |
9,3 |
15,6 |
34,3 |
40,62 |
Source: primary data processing
results
Most of
the results show that PP 70 no 2020 has explained in detail the implementation
of chemical castration, mainly as a prevention of sexual crimes. Chemical
castration as one of the sources of fear to sexual offenders is considered the
right thing. According to validated respondents, rehabilitation carried out
using chemicals such as MAP has a good effect in providing compliance with the
law. The answer was more hesitant in statement 1, supported by the respondents'
belief that the existence of chemical castration violates human rights and
religious laws. Respondents believe that chemical castration can violate
international law as well, so it can be explained that the existence of this
regulation cannot be directly applied in a judge's decision. In Government
Regulation Number 70 of 2020, the executor of chemical castration is not
clearly stated as the authority to carry out chemical castration. This is
supported by the response of the community who agree that the decision on
chemical castration needs to be approved by several other parties. It is only
mentioned that the clinical assessment process is carried out by the ministry
in charge of government affairs in the legal field, the ministry in charge of
government affairs in the social sector and the ministry in charge of
government affairs in the health sector. However, the party that can execute
castration convicts can use the medicine of the National Police of the Republic
of Indonesia through Police Medicine. Castration punishment is still a pro-con in
society because of various opinions and regulations that still overlap so that
it cannot directly ensnare the perpetrators of sexual violence crimes that
occur in the public
CONCLUSION
The conclusion obtained is that the
existence of chemical castration has not been approved by the community as an
alternative punishment for sexual offenders. The academic community agrees that
chemical castration is an act that violates international law, human rights and
humanity.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Arake, L. (2020). Hukuman Kebiri Kimia Bagi Pelaku Kekerasan
Seksual Terhadap Anak Perspektif Fiqh Siyasah. Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum Dan
Politik Islam, 5(1), 20–51.
Daming,
S. (2020). Mengkaji Pidana Kebiri Kimia Dalam Perspektif Medis, Hukum Dan Ham. Supremasi
Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum, 9(1), 22–29.
Ginting,
Y. P., & Susanti, C. (2023). Sosialisasi Kebiri Kimia Bagi Pelaku Kekerasan
Seksual. Jurnal Pengabdian West Science, 2(10), 840–850.
Hasanah,
N. H., & Soponyono, E. (2018). Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Sanksi Kebiri Kimia
dalam Perspektif HAM dan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Magister Hukum
Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 7(3), 305–317.
Heriamsal,
K., & Manurung, F. B. (2024). Strategi Diplomasi Indonesia Dalam Upaya
Mewujudkan Perdamaian Pada Konflik Terbaru Hamas-Israel. Jurnal Hubungan
Luar Negeri, 9(1), 19–48.
Hutapea,
M. R. M. (2020). Penerapan Hukuman Tindakan Kebiri Kimia Dalam Perspektif Hak
Asasi Manusia. Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus, 3(1), 26–34.
Irfawandi,
I., Hirwan, I., Aziz, Z. M., Syukur, M., & Arifin, I. (2023). Analisis
Jenis Jenis Dan Penyebab Kekerasan Seksual Di Lingkungan Kampus. Jurnal
Pendidikan Indonesia, 4(04), 383–392.
Mardiya,
N. Q. (2017). Penerapan Hukuman Kebiri Kimia Bagi Pelaku Kekerasan Seksual. Jurnal
Konstitusi, 14(1), 213–233.
Sabir,
T. A. (2022). Strategi Literasi Media Baru dalam Mengedukasi Masyarakat
Mengenai Kekerasan Seksual (Studi Kasus pada Channel Youtube Remotivi).
Universitas Hasanuddin.
Sari,
I. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Hubungan Kejahatan Perang Dan Hukum Humaniter
Internasional. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 11(2).
Siagian,
F. B. S., Sunarmi, S., & Ekaputra, M. (2023). Penjatuhan Sanksi Pidana
Kebiri Kimia Terhadap Pelaku Kekekrasan Seksual. Locus Journal of Academic
Literature Review, 830–845.
Turangan,
A. M. (2015). Tinjauan Juridis terhadap Penghamilan Paksa menurut Hukum
Humaniter. LEX ET SOCIETATIS, 3(7).
Wahyuni,
S., Hibar, U., & Samudra, D. (2024). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Anak Korban
Kekerasan Seksual Dalam Lingkungan Keluarga Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 35
Tahun 2014. Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 161–169.